TEST: Crucial T710 2TB M.2 SSD
Here you can find a detailed performance and benchmark test of the M.2 NVMe SSD T710 with 2TB (CT2000T710SSD8) from Crucial.12372
0,16 $
| Technical data | |
| Image | 
|
| Manufacturer | Crucial |
| Model number | CT2000T710SSD8 |
| Storage capacity | 2048 GB (1863 GiB) |
| pSLC-Cache | 380 GB approx. |
| Read speed | 14500 MB/s |
| Write speed | 13800 MB/s |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Connection | M.2 2280 |
| Memory module (NAND) | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✓ yes |
| TBW (Total Bytes Written) | 1200 Terabyte |
| Controller | Silicon Motion SM2508 |
| Price | ca. 319 USD (= 0,16 $ / GB) |
| Paid link | Buy on Amazon |
Compared to the top performer*
*) Test result evaluated according to AS SSD Score within the same size.
AS SSD Benchmark
Standard performance test
The standard test was performed using a 5 GB file. A total score of 12372 points was achieved.
| AS SSD | Read: | Write: |
|---|---|---|
| Seq in megabytes per second |
10800,10 MB/s |
11697,80 MB/s |
| 4K in megabytes per second |
74,56 MB/s |
218,40 MB/s |
| 4K-64Thrd in megabytes per second |
3092,40 MB/s |
4530,88 MB/s |
| Access time in milliseconds |
0,017 ms |
0,089 ms |
| Score | 4247 |
5919 |
| Total score | 12372 |
|
Copy Performance Test
A common everyday situation is simulated here. Three test folders are created:
- ISO (folder with two large files)
- Program (folder with many small files)
- Game (folder with small and large files)
The three folders are copied using the Windows Copy command (the cache remains enabled). The practical test of September 01, 2025 shows the performance for simultaneous write and read operations. The lower the duration, the better the performance.
| AS SSD Copy-Benchmark | Transfer rate: | Duration: |
|---|---|---|
| ISO two large files |
3967,31 MB/s |
0,58 s |
| Program many small files |
1315,60 MB/s |
5,35 s |
| Game small and large files |
2657,46 MB/s |
2,60 s |
Compression Performance Test
This measures the write and read speed of the Crucial SSD, depending on the compressibility of the data (according to the manufacturer, these should be 14500 MB/s and 13800 MB/s respectively ).
CrystalDiskMark Benchmark
Here, two sequential and two random performance tests are performed, similar to the ones performed on the AS SSD.
| CDM | Read [MB/s] | Write [MB/s] |
|---|---|---|
| SEQ1M Q8T1 |
14389,40 |
13442,30 |
| SEQ1M Q1T1 |
8872,10 |
9775,70 |
| RND4K Q32T16 |
5292,42 |
3996,60 |
| RND4K Q1T1 |
80,71 |
245,08 |
Input/Output operations per second
| CDM | Read [IOPS] | Write [IOPS] |
|---|---|---|
| SEQ1M Q8T1 |
13.722,80 |
12.819,60 |
| SEQ1M Q1T1 |
8.461,10 |
9.322,80 |
| RND4K Q32T16 |
1.292.090,00 |
975.733,00 |
| RND4K Q1T1 |
19.704,60 |
59.834,20 |
Average latency
| CDM | Read [µs] | Write [µs] |
|---|---|---|
| SEQ1M Q8T1 |
509,89 |
607,34 |
| SEQ1M Q1T1 |
118,08 |
107,15 |
| RND4K Q32T16 |
392,33 |
521,91 |
| RND4K Q1T1 |
50,66 |
16,63 |
HD Tune Pro Endurance test
This is a long term test to make full use of the memory capacity. You can see when a cache is full and the writing performance decreases.
A test file of 400 GB was written to the medium.
After approx. 380 GB, the pSLC-Cache was full and the performance was throttled.
At least the test file could be read with an average write speed of 11237 MB/s and written with 10618 MB/s.
ATTO Disk Benchmark
Here, a 256 MB file is written several times to the Crucial M.2 SSD. The I/O block size varies (from 512 bytes to 64 megabytes). The larger the blocks, the faster they were written and read.
Information about the test system can be found at the bottom of the home page.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.