GiGimundo G500 2TB SATA SSD
Here you will find a detailed speed, performance and benchmark test review. Tested was the SATA SSD G500 with 2TB (G500-2TB-GD-EP) from the brand GiGimundo.
| Technical specifications (manufacturer information) | |
| Product image | 
|
| Manufacturer | GiGimundo |
| Model number | G500-2TB-GD-EP |
| Capacity | 2048 GB (1908 GiB) |
| pSLC cache | >300 GB approx. |
| Read speed | 560 MB/s |
| Write speed | 500 MB/s |
| Interface | SATA 6 Gbps |
| Connector | 2.5" |
| Memory module (NAND) | TLC |
| Controller | Silicon Motion SM2259XT |
Compare product Compared to the test winner*
v0.567a Drive: 0(ATA) OS: 10.0 build 19045 Model: GGM Fw : V0414A0 Size : 1953514 MB [2048.4 GB] From smart : [SMI2259XT] [V0414A0 03] [TSBB3] Controller : SM2259XA bufferless FlashID: 0x98,0x48,0x99,0xb3,0x7a,0xf2,0x0,0x0 - Toshiba 64L BiCS3 TLC 16k 1024Gb/CE 512Gb/die 2Plane/die Channel: 2 CE : 8 TotDie : 32 Plane : 2 Die/Ce : 2 Ch map : 0x03 CE map : 0xFF Inter. : 16 First Fblock : 2 Total Fblock : 2958 Total Hblock : 30524 Fblock Per Ce : 2958 Fblock Per Die: 2958 Original Spare Block Count : 151 Vendor Marked Bad Block : 0 Bad Block From Pretest : 65
We put the GiGimundo SATA SSD through a detailed test. You can find the test result / test report here:
AS SSD Benchmark
Standard performance test
The standard test was performed with a 1 GB file. A total score of 414 points was achieved.
Copy performance test
A common everyday scenario is simulated here. Three test folders are created:
- ISO (folder with two large files)
- Program (folder with many small files)
- Game (folder with small and large files)
The three folders are copied using the Windows copy command (cache remains enabled). The real-world test from 27 February 2025 shows performance during simultaneous write and read operations. The lower the duration, the better.
| AS SSD Copy Benchmark | Transfer rate: | Duration: |
|---|---|---|
| ISO two large files |
881.53 MB/s |
1.22 s |
| Program typical program folder with many small files |
1,138.90 MB/s |
1.24 s |
| Game a game folder with small and large files |
1,807.52 MB/s |
0.76 s |
Compression performance test
Here, speed is measured depending on how compressible the data is.
CrystalDiskMark Benchmark
Similar to AS SSD, two sequential and two random performance tests are carried out here and the write and read speed (manufacturer specs: 560 MB/s and 500 MB/s) the GiGimundo SATA SSD is measured.
| CDM | Read [MB/s] | Write [MB/s] |
|---|---|---|
| SEQ1M Q8T1 |
533.89 |
451.15 |
| SEQ1M Q1T1 |
532.41 |
440.45 |
| RND4K Q32T16 |
227.57 |
180.04 |
| RND4K Q1T1 |
38.44 |
91.10 |
IOPS (Input/Output operations per second)
| CDM | Read [IOPS] | Write [IOPS] |
|---|---|---|
| SEQ1M Q8T1 |
509.20 |
430.30 |
| SEQ1M Q1T1 |
507.70 |
420.00 |
| RND4K Q32T16 |
55,558.80 |
43,955.60 |
| RND4K Q1T1 |
9,385.30 |
22,241.00 |
Average latency
| CDM | Read [µs] | Write [µs] |
|---|---|---|
| SEQ1M Q8T1 |
15,675.00 |
18,526.40 |
| SEQ1M Q1T1 |
1,968.97 |
2,379.13 |
| RND4K Q32T16 |
9,202.06 |
11,630.20 |
| RND4K Q1T1 |
106.42 |
44.85 |
HD Tune Pro long-term test
A long-term test was performed to fully utilize the storage. You can see at what point the cache (if present) becomes full and write performance drops. A test file of 300 GB was written to the medium. The exact cache size could not be determined because the test file did not exhaust (push to the limit) the cache. The test file could at least be read with an average read speed of 512 MB/s and written at 422 MB/s.
HD Tune Pro Benchmark
HD Tune writes a 1 GB file to the GiGimundo SATA SSD. The transfer data of the read speed is displayed graphically. The minimum, maximum and average values are also determined. The measured access time and burst rate are also shown.
ATTO Disk Benchmark
Here, a 256 MB file is written to the GiGimundo SATA SSD multiple times. The I/O block size varies (from 512 bytes to 64 megabytes). The larger the blocks, the faster writing and reading usually becomes.
SSD-Z Benchmark
Similar to HD Tune, a 500 MB file is written to the GiGimundo SATA SSD here. The transfer data is displayed. The more consistent the line, the better. Unfortunately, the tool no longer works correctly from around 4,000 MB/s and no line is displayed (and sometimes incorrect min/max data is shown).
You can find information about the test system at the bottom of the homepage.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.